IMAGE: HARPERSBAZAAR.COM
Members of our forums were far from blown away. “Cheesy as hell and by Richardson, fail and fail IMO,” kokobombon slammed straight away.
“They must be showcasing her new line of workout clothes. Regardless, overused styling on the cover mixed with typical Richardson tackiness,” added justaguy in agreement.
Also unenthusiastic was Marc10: “It truly amazes me how Kate manages to maintain this status of covering a bunch of magazines, attending every award show without being a relevant movie star in…how many years now?”
GlamorousBoy wasn’t buying Kate’s presence, either. “Even worse than I expected… and those unoriginal, boring, badly Photoshopped newsstand covers really bother me. Those covers are always the same, no matter who is on the cover,” he complained in frustration.
“Why is Kate Hudson on a cover of a magazine in 2015?” asked liv4beauty, unwilling to change the attitude of the thread.
“So I’m guessing her last cover did well because they basically reproduced it. Big smile, lots of pink, done. This magazine is truly pathetic. More so than any other,” confessed A.D.C.
IMAGE: HARPERSBAZAAR.COM
Check out Kate doing all sorts of random and acrobatic poses in her cover story and join the conversation here.
