Quote:
Originally Posted by BerlinRocks
^that's pretty much because of the similarities btw the July 2008 editorial and this one that "one" had the idea of creating this thread ...
well i'm not sure. but "one" talked about this editorial when "one" saw the July 2008's editorial ...
|
I mean, hi first at all mr berlin roks.
first at at all i wanna say thanks for your VOGUE PARIS exquisiste archive.
second at all I saw the W's july cover 'cause i receive W in my house.
I'd like to say that the 97 editorial is too much better than the july 2008 editorial.
Why?
here the girls look so dreamy and glamorous, I mean you want to be there, but in nowadays version i feel pretty scared due to the gay schemes involved such as the s&m pics (not showed as S&M but the message is clear and the pic whit Lara Stone and The muscle rabbit... creepie!
I mean W today is loosing its way.
Mr Berlin Rocks. did u see september W?
i mean kate hudson looks like an airbrushed drag queen.
Did u remeber the good covers on W with true models like Carolyn Murphy or Karen Elson.
I do like the vintage W editoriasl because they're like art, but nowadays ones are so... trashy. I mean the only ones who worth the buy of this mag are the Inez+Vinoodh ones and the Mert+Marcus not celebrity ones.
i hope not o sound like "oh the july 2008 was better" 'cause i do not want to say that.
I'm not familiar at all with American magazines from the 90s era, so I'm more than happy about this thread.. I'm really looking forward to other people's contributions. This is mine...
Linear Mode
