Go Back   the Fashion Spot > Front Row > Designers and Collections
Home Links FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Reply to This Discussion
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-01-2004   #1
backstage pass
Profile: 
Location: New York, New York
Posts: 571

I'm confused. Whenever I here that another designer comes to take over an old design house, after their first collection, I usually here that they are not doing what so and so would have done. Case in point: Julien McDonald at Givenchy. When he was called upon to give a new edge to the house, we all knew what he was about: rock and roll, sex, bright colors, extravagence (I know I spelled that wrong ), but after his first HC collection tanked, he decided to take a different approach and when he did, people still weren't satisfied. What does it really mean to revamp a fashion house? Does it mean taking a completely different approach, or does it mean doing what the previous designer did?
 

Old 10-01-2004   #2
backstage pass
Profile: 
Location: New York, New York
Posts: 571

no.2
 
Old 10-01-2004   #3
backstage pass
Profile: 
Location: New York, New York
Posts: 571

no.3
 

Get rid of these ads... register today, it's FREE
Old 10-01-2004   #4
backstage pass
Profile: 
Location: New York, New York
Posts: 571

no.4
 
Old 10-01-2004   #5
Naturellement pulpeuse

PrinceOfCats's Avatar
Profile: 
Location: Beyond the looking glass (5eme actually)
Gender: femme
Posts: 9,985

Maybe John Galliano just has the Midas touch

I think it takes a new take on the old houses styles...Tom Ford totally revamped Gucci.
__________________
Candy is dandy but sex won't rot your teeth.
 
Old 10-01-2004   #6
V.I.P.

purplelucrezia's Avatar
Profile: 
Gender: femme
Posts: 15,893

I actually like number three. If I was to take over Giverchy, I would work with their traditions while making it a bit more fun. For example, I would bring back some of the great outfits he designed for Audrey Hepburn and take advantage of the retroish feeling. I would make it a bit like Chanel, which takes the classic looks they are known for (like the tweed suit) and adds little details and a new cut to make it contemporary again. :P
__________________
(\_/)
(O.o)
(> <) This is Bunny. Copy Bunny into your signature to help him on his way to world domination.
 

Get rid of these ads... register today, it's FREE
Old 10-01-2004   #7
V.I.P.
Profile: 
Location: NYC
Gender: homme
Posts: 3,601

Quote:
Originally posted by ebowleg@Jan 10th, 2004 - 2:33 pm
no.4
this thing rules.

more from asethic perspectives though
 
Old 11-01-2004   #8
etre soi-meme

Lena's Avatar
Profile: 
Location: europe
Gender: femme
Posts: 23,711

Quote:
Originally posted by ebowleg@Jan 10th, 2004 - 10:31 pm
. Case in point: Julien McDonald at Givenchy. When he was called upon to give a new edge to the house, we all knew what he was about: rock and roll, sex, bright colors, extravagence (I know I spelled that wrong ), but after his first HC collection tanked, he decided to take a different approach and when he did, people still weren't satisfied. What does it really mean to revamp a fashion house? Does it mean taking a completely different approach, or does it mean doing what the previous designer did?
Julien McDonald is a very good example of someone not doing a good job at revamping a fashion house, he's light years away from the Givenchy spirit and a very bad choice for this position.

Lagerfeld on the other hand is a perfect example of how revamp should be, his work for chanel is quite near to the spirit of Mlle Chanel. Ford also did a good job for Gucci. Clements Ribiero did a good job at Cacharel. E2 did a good job at leonard only to lose the post after three seasons

I think revamping should stay close to the style of the 'revamped' house which is not the case lately. Its a hard job for a designer, needs real dicipline of artistic freedom and it seems some are not ready for this (see whats been happening at the house of Grès.. it is a pretty good example)
__________________
lighten up
 
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Pulling Fashion Strings - WSJ Anna Wintour Interview Astrid21 Behind the Lens 26 23-08-2007 10:29 PM
Yohji Yamamoto: " I Hate Fashion " mrrene Designers and Collections 97 10-07-2007 10:48 PM
NY Post's 50 Best Dressed Women In NYC Spacemiu Star Style 50 27-12-2006 03:06 PM
Is Fashion Still Cool? Astrid21 Designers and Collections 69 21-09-2006 10:29 PM
Genderbending Gaultier Celebrates To The Pwr Of 2 ignitioned32 Designers and Collections 5 04-06-2003 10:46 PM







Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0 RC1

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:47 AM.


 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
http://www.thefashionspot.com/terms