Go Back   the Fashion Spot > the Sidewalk Café > Rumor has it...
Home Links FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Reply to This Discussion
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-02-2007   #1
trendsetter

kateelle's Avatar
Profile: 
Gender: femme
Posts: 1,487

Charlize Theron sued



Ctv:

NEW YORK -- Swiss watchmaker Raymond Weil has filed a breach of contract lawsuit against Oscar-winning actress Charlize Theron.

In court papers filed late Monday in state Supreme Court, Weil said Theron signed an endorsement deal saying that from October 2005 through December 2006 she would only wear Weil's high-end watches.

That deal allowed Weil to use Theron's photographs in its advertisements in exchange for "substantial funds," court papers said.

Meanwhile, Theron had an endorsement deal to promote a Dior perfume, Weil's lawsuit said. The 31-year-old actress "was actually photographed wearing a watch from the Christian Dior line" at a March 14, 2006, news conference at a film festival in Austin, Texas, court papers said. A photo of her wearing the watch is included as an exhibit.

"Although the agreement clearly prohibits (Theron) from appearing in any advertisement for any jewelry, even for charity, she appeared wearing a necklace in an advertisement benefiting an AIDS charity, violating the agreement, from February 2006 to December 2006," the court papers said.

"Plaintiffs were led to believe and had a right to believe by their written agreement that (Theron) would not promote jewelry or watches."

A spokeswoman for Theron didn't immediately return a call Tuesday from The Associated Press.

The lawsuit doesn't say how much Weil is seeking in damages, but the watchmaker's lawyer, David Jaroslawicz, said his client had spent more than $20 million on the Theron advertising campaign.

dlisted

Last edited by kateelle : 07-02-2007 at 04:48 PM.
 

Old 07-02-2007   #2
V.I.P.

vmob84's Avatar
Profile: 
Gender: femme
Posts: 4,969

wow that's pretty low that he's protesting that she appeared in a charity advertisment wearing a necklace sold for charity.
 
Old 07-02-2007   #3
101st monkey airborne

mellowdrama's Avatar
Profile: 
Location: San Francisco
Gender: femme
Posts: 1,270

You know, I was just about to buy a $100,000 Weil watch because the an ad I saw of Charlize in Vanity Fair. However, when I saw the picture of Charlize in a Dior necklace, I gnawed off my left hand and wrist in bewildered frustration. Now I can easily spend twice my income on a watch, but I do have a budget to keep.

Now, not only do I not know what time it is, but I can no longer pleasure myself in the way I am accustomed, and Paul McCartney continues to spurn my attentions. Can anyone recommend a good attorney?
__________________
Pictured above left: her face a mask of stony courage, future Pvt. Eureka Patchouli Jolie-Pitt wins the War on Terror
 

Get rid of these ads... register today, it's FREE
Old 07-02-2007   #4
V.I.P.

vmob84's Avatar
Profile: 
Gender: femme
Posts: 4,969

 
Old 07-02-2007   #5
fashion insider

Laska's Avatar
Profile: 
Location: London/Moscow
Gender: femme
Posts: 2,084

Poor Charlize, I hope she gets this silly thing resolved!
 
Old 07-02-2007   #6
fashion insider

VainJane's Avatar
Profile: 
Location: Virginia and Seattle
Gender: femme
Posts: 2,041

Eh....if she signed that contract stating that she would only wear their jewelry/watches in advertisements and they gave her money (probably a buttload) then I think Charlize is at fault. That's what happens when you sign a contract-- you agree to abide by the rules the company put-forth. While forbiding someone from wearing charity jewelry might not be the most noble thing to do, apparently no one forced Charlize to sign that contract-- if it's a legal contract that she knew what she was getting into when she signed it.

Based on what I read in this article I feel that Charlize is the guilty party
__________________
My heart remains with you. I'm thinking of you always. With all the love that I possess~

Last edited by VainJane : 07-02-2007 at 08:02 PM.
 

Get rid of these ads... register today, it's FREE
Old 08-02-2007   #7
i still feel your lips.

kissmesweet's Avatar
Profile: 
Gender: femme
Posts: 18,161

Charlize will pull through. She's amaaaaaaaaaazing!
__________________
I'm trying not to think about you
Can't you just
let me be?
 
Old 08-02-2007   #8
V.I.P.

Tushka_BeLLa's Avatar
Profile: 
Location: South Africa
Gender: femme
Posts: 7,684

How trivial ....
 
Old 08-02-2007   #9
trendsetter

kateelle's Avatar
Profile: 
Gender: femme
Posts: 1,487

There was very similar case like this involving Jessica Simpson as well. She failed to wear the labels jeans out in public and was sued for $100 million. Seriously, be freaking reasonable, they are busy people who cannot be conscious of what they're supposed to be promoting at all times. I think this is just so sleazy...how much more publicity can they get now?

Last edited by kateelle : 08-02-2007 at 10:17 PM.
 

Get rid of these ads... register today, it's FREE
Old 09-02-2007   #10
front row

splatooey's Avatar
Profile: 
Location: NYC
Gender: femme
Posts: 441

^ i disagree, if someone is paying you MILLIONS of dollars to wear their merchandise that you didnt even pay for, you should get fined...why should companies have to put up with this kind of behavior, its a business contract, and if you dont think you can handle the terms, don't sign the contract, its very simple.
__________________
Broke and fashionable? Is it worth it?!
 
Old 09-02-2007   #11
trendsetter

kateelle's Avatar
Profile: 
Gender: femme
Posts: 1,487

Disagree all you want it was for a CHARITY, please, how childish/petty can you get.

Last edited by kateelle : 09-02-2007 at 10:33 PM.
 
Old 09-02-2007   #12
fashion insider

VainJane's Avatar
Profile: 
Location: Virginia and Seattle
Gender: femme
Posts: 2,041

Quote:
Originally Posted by kateelle
Disagree all you want it was for a CHARITY, please, how childish/petty can you get.
Just reading what the article says, Charlize was photographed wearing a necklace for the AIDS charity AND was also photographed wearing a Dior watch during a news conference at a film festival (there is no mention that the watch was for charity). Both violated the contract, as stated by the article, so even if she was allowed to wear jewelry for charity she would still be violating the contract because she wore the Dior watch.

My personal opinion is that if the article is correct (and Charlize knew the limitations of the agreement) then by signing that jewelry contract Charlize was agreeing with the childish/petty statement that she wouldn't wear jewelry for charity. I guess millions of dollars makes it a lot easier

Of course that's just my opinion.
__________________
My heart remains with you. I'm thinking of you always. With all the love that I possess~
 

Get rid of these ads... register today, it's FREE
Old 09-02-2007   #13
101st monkey airborne

mellowdrama's Avatar
Profile: 
Location: San Francisco
Gender: femme
Posts: 1,270

^Gotta agree, a contract's a contract. Just recently a company headhunted me for contractual work, knowing full well that I already had my own private massage practice, then emailed me a "non-compete" contract to sign. Had I signed, the terms I would've agreed to would've effectively enabled these folks to sue me for having my own private practice. Idiot's bargain.
__________________
Pictured above left: her face a mask of stony courage, future Pvt. Eureka Patchouli Jolie-Pitt wins the War on Terror
 
Old 10-02-2007   #14
fashion elite

justlooking's Avatar
Profile: 
Location: peter pan land
Gender: femme
Posts: 2,760

Quote:
Originally Posted by splatooey
^ i disagree, if someone is paying you MILLIONS of dollars to wear their merchandise that you didnt even pay for, you should get fined...why should companies have to put up with this kind of behavior, its a business contract, and if you dont think you can handle the terms, don't sign the contract, its very simple.
I agree.
__________________
"somebody has been telling me that you can wear anything you want to.you just have to 'own it'.but i think that even if you 'own it'.and you think you look amazing...and you feel like you look amazing...you could still possibly actually look like a moron"- sg
 
Old 10-02-2007   #15
backstage pass

cric-croc's Avatar
Profile: 
Location: london
Gender: femme
Posts: 537

true
 

Get rid of these ads... register today, it's FREE
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
US Vogue October 2004 : Charlize Theron by Mario Testino moussemaker Magazines 45 3 Weeks Ago 05:04 PM
Petra Magazine : Charlize Theron seleria73 Magazines 18 21-04-2004 05:42 PM







Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0 RC1

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:34 PM.


 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
http://www.thefashionspot.com/terms