The styling looks ridiculous and mismatched. The hair/makeup/earrings belong with a different outfit (roberto cavalli ss06 runway flashback), and certainly this Rodarte outfit doesn't belong on Rachel
Soccor mom preparing for her kid's halloween party?
Compared to previous covers it is good....but to say it is great is too much - who will remember this in 5, 10 years?! Or are we using a different set of standards for US VOGUE?
I don't like the cover. But I looove Rachel. She one of the most beatifull woman in the world.
I'm soo happy Anna Jagodzinska got edd in new issue of Vogue US.
I really like the cover! All the mismatching fits Rachel very well, actually I don't think that there's one single thing that doesn't fit her. Now, if her editorial is only two pages long, I swear I'm going to kill somebody! LOL! Keira gets 15 pages!!!! and Rachel gets 2? How unfair!
Completely random, completely unexpected and absolutely gorgeous. Rachel is one of the most underrated beauties in Hollywood. That is the best Vogue cover in years. Why is Rachel on the cover? What project is she promoting? Actually, to be honest, it looks more like a British UK Vogue cover than an American one. Craig McDean needs to shoot more Vogue covers.
__________________
"She wore those white gloves, but she was no saint..."
Last edited by scriptgirl : 16-09-2008 at 11:51 AM.
For them, this is a fabulous cover....great color, beautiful fashion and a fresh new beautiful face on the cover. Keira Knightley ends up on another US Vogue cover in the next six months and I'm done subscribing/buying this magazine.....have been a subscriber for 30 years and have had it with their lack of innovativeness and their recycling of the same faces over and over. Ridiculous. Could there actually be a light at the end of the tunnel for US Vogue??
Linear Mode
