Vogue Paris March 2007 : Natasha Poly by Inez & Vinoodh

[MulletProof]

it doesnt look like a cover really..
..looks more like a spring supplement or intro for an editorial..

[Faith Akiyama]

Wow, more like a Saks Fifth Ave. catalogue shot...

[Cosette]

i agree with mullet...

but even if it is a cover, i rather like it. i think she looks beautiful.

[testinofan]

ugly cover, very 80s

[sethii]

They will test more than one picture with 'VOGUE' text, I won't believe it until its in shops

[glósóli]

I refuse to believe that picture is the cover.

[bluedolphin]

i can't believe that photo is the cover!very strange!

[pathetic]

god , please no !!!!

[BerlinRocks]

it might be a photo from an editorial. it's from Glamour, right?
or it's the cover of a Vogue Supplement...

[Kanna]

Maybe I'm the only one who likes the picture.. I hope it will be the cover.

[amor]

it doesnt bother me at all if its the real cover...

[kissmesweet]

The cover is so awkward. Sometimes the strange words and this time, it clearly doesn't. I usually love Natasha, on the runway though--more than in editorials.

[city girl]

i don't mind this at all..nice dress and natasha looks gorgeous
just a bit different for a vogue paris cover

[taben]

I love that shot, Natasha looks gorgeous ! i wouldn't mind at all if it were the cover ! And even if it's not i really hope that Natasha gets the cover !!

[Xone]

i think its a cool pic...yeah very 80's but natasha looks really pretty.....when this issue come out???