IMAGE: ELLEUK.COM
“Not bad, I liked the stripped down raw look. Honestly she’s quite beautiful when she doesn’t insist on doing her makeup like a drag queen. And she is MUCH better at emoting through her eyes than Kendall,” praised marsnoop2, getting us off to a healthy start.
“She looks very fresh-faced and pretty! Good for her!” added an equally impressed russianelf.
[ 25 Reasons the Kardashian-Jenners Owned 2015 ]
Also pleasantly surprised was Oxymore: “Never thought I would say that but that’s a really good cover. When she puts all that makeup off, she looks way better.”
JesseDillon agreed, confessing, “I expected to hate this, and I admit I rolled my eyes even seeing her name, but this is quite lovely. As I said about her small feature in U.S. Vogue recently she looks SO much better when she is styled to look her age instead of like some mini-Kim.”
But not everyone’s tastes were catered to. “This is embarrassing; how is she getting so many covers?” voiced Yohji.
“I have a sick feeling that 2016 will be yet another year we’re bombarded with Kardashian/Jenner covers everywhere. UGH,” slammed a disapproving Handbag Queen.
“When will it end with this family?!??!” asked happycanadian.
Check out some previews and see Lucky Blue’s cover inside our thread here.
